Suella Braverman has suggested that the UK could become “the first Islamist nation with nuclear weapons”.

The former home secretary said Britain could “fall into the hands of Muslim fundamentalism” and become like Iran.

She made the incendiary comments in a speech to the right-wing Heritage Foundation think-tank in Washington.

Braverman said: “Vice-president JD Vance said at the National Conservatism conference, at which I also spoke in the summer, that the UK was going to be the first Islamist nation with nuclear weapons. I don’t think he was joking.

“Is it an impossibility that 20 years from now it will be the UK, not China or Russia, that will emerge as the greatest strategic threat to the USA?

“Born out of a broken relationship and weak leadership. What happens if the UK falls into the hands of Muslim fundamentalism, our legal system gets substituted for Sharia Law and our nuclear capabilities vest in a regime not too dissimilar to that of Iran today?

“Regardless of whether one thinks that is a realistic outcome, which I do not, should we not have the courage to ask these questions?”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Only 6% of population is muslim.

    This is just feeding a dangerously crazy rightwing meme. Stupid irresponsible woman.

  • sunzu2
    link
    fedilink
    213 months ago

    At least we now have evidence that it aint that white people are evil piece shit but rather anyone who has money and power.

    Can we now focus on fighting this class war?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      But equally racialised minorities are still the people that bare the brunt of the systematic violence of Capitalism and the state repression. In this instance as an example this is targeted at Muslims, but in the racialised sense any person of MENA or Indian subcontinent ethnic origin (or who looks like it).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      273 months ago

      Yep.

      Who would have thought that one of the most racist and cruel conservatives would be wrong and lying?

    • Skua
      link
      fedilink
      23 months ago

      Islamic yes, Islamist I don’t think so. That usually refers to a much more fundamentalist ideology. That said, Pakistan did test its first nukes under the dictatorship in the 80s, and while I don’t know much about that period it does at a surface level look like it could probably be described as an Islamist period for Pakistan. So maybe there was an Islamist nuclear power and isn’t anymore?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Whoops, you are right, i don’t know much about pakistanis separation of politics and religion today … I went with the word used in the title of the post without considering it’s exact meaning(s), which are now :

        https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/Islamist
        Islamist (plural Islamists)
        1- (now rare) A Muslim. [from 19th c.]
        2- A scholastic Muslim who specializes in Muslim academics. [from 1910s]
        3- A Muslim who espouses Islamic fundamentalist beliefs. [from 1980s]

        interestingly, it should be easy to say that USA has now become a Christianistic Christianist country.

        • Skua
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          Oh, interesting, I didn’t know about the earlier usages!

    • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      honkeys before 2010 probably thought that’s a drink or something

      and also after 2010

      i just realized she’s not white but she’s liberal so close enough

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        103 months ago

        i just realized she’s not white but she’s liberal so close enough

        She’s a right-wing, hate spewing, absolute spiteful cunt of a conservative.

      • Fishroot [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        i just realized she’s not white but she’s liberal so close enough

        She is a Tory, She was the one that tries to clear out the migrant processing camps in UK and deport everyone to Rwanda IIRC

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        43 months ago

        She’s not liberal in any sense of the word, including the modern American misframing of liberalism.

        She’s a racist, disability hating piece of shit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -13 months ago

          Liberalism as a political project was first and foremost a way to justify american slave ownership.

          Domenico Losurdo’s “Liberalism: A Counter History” covers the history of the ideology well.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            This feels like you fail to even have a basic grasp of the words you use.

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism

            Its always been said that Americans are generally pretty poor in their understanding of politics. They don’t understand socialism, they don’t understand the difference between socialism and communism, and they don’t understand what a liberal is, getting it confused with communism and fascism depending on the day of the week.

            Liberalism was used as the ideology to chop off rich peoples heads in France. Liberalism was used as the reason to remove royalty from the head of state in Britain.

            NEOLIBERAL is a form of conservative fiscal liberalism to justify privatisation and deregulation.

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism

            Suella Braverman is simply a sack of shit.

            Born out of a broken relationship and weak leadership. What happens if the UK falls into the hands of Muslim fundamentalism, our legal system gets substituted for Sharia Law and our nuclear capabilities vest in a regime not too dissimilar to that of Iran today?

            Thats a lot of stretching, and absolutely nothing to do woth fucking liberalism. It’s simply moronic.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -1
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I appreciate that books are a bit harder to read than Wikipedia pages, but I really do recommend it.

              I’ll be less glib: liberalism was used to justify French slave ownership too. It also has been the justification for global interventionist policy by the imperial core. “Bringing liberal democracy to dictatorships.”

  • Lad
    link
    fedilink
    163 months ago

    She’s in fucking cuckoo land. Dumb fascist arsehole.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Pakistan ceased to exist?

    Iraq had them too according to her fellow lying western politicians.

    • Lad
      link
      fedilink
      103 months ago

      An idiot from the most far-right faction of the Tory party.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      73 months ago

      It’s weird because she was so sensible and well-balanced when in government. Perhaps she has been replaced by pod people. We should try and rescue her - I have a few days free in April.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    53 months ago

    “Regardless of whether one thinks that is a realistic outcome, which I do not, should we not have the courage to ask these questions?”

    JAQing off is a form of bad-faith propaganda.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It’s a fucking Anglo-Saxon Norman monarchy. Anyone in England insensate enough to be afraid that the country could suddenly become dominated by another religion should be remanded to reeducation immediately

  • Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    33 months ago

    How exactly is this supposedly going to happen? Given how massively under represented Muslims are in parliament, how exactly are they going to gain control.