Summary

The Trump administration abruptly cut funding to the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which provides over $160 million annually to U.S. libraries. Elon Musk’s DOGE teams executed the cuts, immediately terminating dozens of state library grants.

Officials in California, Connecticut, and Washington were first notified, affecting programs that support rural and underserved communities.

Library leaders call the move “devastating.” Congressional Democrats and publishers condemned the decision, warning it could cause mass library closures.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    At what point does being a part of the U.S. become a liability? They’re intentionally wrecking things now, and its plain as day to anyone with two brain cells to rub together.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I don’t believe that this is a particularly dramatic change. DOGE just cuts federal stuff. If a state wants to run a library on state funding, it can.

      The real issue with DOGE cuts comes up when they’re cutting something at the federal level that needs to happen at the federal level, where doing it at the state level either would be problematic or is not within the scope of state authority, because then there’s no real alternative.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        010 days ago

        It’s going to be a pretty dramatic change for anyone depending on services that are cut.

        States don’t have unlimited money.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Neither does the federal government. Washington State has the seventh-highest per capita income in the US. The great bulk of poor states vote Republican, so any negative funding impact is most likely primarily whacking the people who are furiously insisting that Trump be in office.

          Not to mention that this program is apparently aimed at rural areas, which also vote more Republican.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        This just a domino in a long line of domino’s. They’ve now cut forever chemical bans, water quality requirements, medical research funding, housing for low incoming families funds, pulled critical vaccine research, and more. That’s just off the top of my head. At this point, what is the benefit of being a part of the Union? There needs to be a net benefit for us to continue existing within the larger U.S. system.

        It’s starting to seem like these people are trying to speed run a U.S. break-up ala Soviet Union back in the 90s.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        09 days ago

        The problem is that you’re going to take the US back to the early 20th century, where there was a very large disparity in quality of life within the country. If these cuts are maintained, I won’t be surprised if some of the poorest American states become poorer than some Mexican states.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      010 days ago

      Not sure when this liability became obvious, but I suppose it started to affect regions somewhere in 1860x when the US proved with steel that there is no quitting.