So that by itself is a very good question, but the ability of not consuminy it should not mean the obligation(or prohibition), or even the morals on the wheter of eating or not eating meat.

So thats my argument, we really should not matter that much about what is on the meal of people by itself. Maybe, one day, artificial meat becomes better than normal one and we end up replacing meat, and humannity, accidentally, end up as a vegan species by itself.

The thing is that involving the morally good or wrong about something like food shouldnt be a thing if it can be improved or obsoleted.

And? the thing is that still we can make do, its like implying a modern PC cannot run a NES game.

You have to emulate stuff btw.

apes can eat also bugs, bugs are animals

Which can be more ecologic given newer tech and incentives

No, but our morality cant really dictate our biology either.

give it fugu livers or anything that is mildly toxic for us

Theyre not? We are apes,apes like of veggies and meat.

Plus, we are one of the most carnivore of the big apes,our guts are adapted to both meat and vegetables, we are not able to decompose celulose.

Can we just not ban?

People ¿Do you all know that both mice and rats poop?

The thing is that on the other way it would be unjust to entities where no one is really responsible for it.

Actually most buisnesses in Europe arent corporations, because they dont really have shareholders.

This is absurdly unspecific, AI is mostly software.

Im not Happy about using AI for war,but that is because war exists, I’d like AI to be FOSS and accesible locally for everyone.

They’re juridical entities,akin but not exactly people.

They still have rights and obligations but they’re not people in the strict sense, you cant incarcerate a corporation.

Thats nice to know

Probably btw, it would make sense that he geninuelly thinks that but idk

Im also new to here, how’s this place?