• 26 Posts
  • 1.02K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle

  • Welcome, comrade!

    As another user said, it’s a little different. In a nutshell, Reddit is a single big tree, all stuff within the Fediverse are more like many smaller trees.


    A more nuance…

    In terms of who depends on whom, imagine Reddit and its admins as a lone tree. A tree is an ‘instance’. The mods are branches, and subreddits are leaves, and users as ants living on that tree.

    When Reddit censors e.g. anti-fascist and pro-freedom of speech stuff, you as the ant cannot really go to another tree. Reddit isn’t connected with alternatives. But the Fediverse is different.


    Lemmy, Piefed, and kbin on the other hand, are more like a forest of trees. Lemmy might be the evergreens, Piefed broadleafs, mbin/kbin ferns, and so on. There isn’t one “lemmy”, Piefed, or mbin/kbin. There are many sidelemmies (or sidepies), which on Reddit you would call a subreddit.

    There are also many trees in that forest of each type. They’re connected. So when one’s down, you can easily move to another tree.

    Now, the Fediverse overall, is like multiple interconnected forests. There’s a Peertube forest, a Friendica forest, a Lemmy/Piefed/kbin/mbin forest, and so on.


    As an instance owner, you can pick your ‘tree’ to be (dis)connected to other trees and forests, to the extent you want, aka. (de)federation. And users can do the same.

    If you’re going to (self)host an instance of your own, I recommend following similar policies as the Blåhaj ones, they’re good. Alternatively, donate to your instance of choice every now and then.


  • As far as daily drivers go and if your threat model would say your risk is low, I think Fairphone with e/ is a great choice, yeah. I was thinking of the Fairphone 6 for that case, actually.

    But if your threat model is higher, or if you want to support people with higher threat models, or want to prioritise security, I think GOS seems better. My worry is primarily about the ethics of a Motorola or Pixel, considering where Motorola is based and who owns it.


  • They are, yes. But it feels all very paradoxical.

    A company owned by a country with pervasive surveillance, set in a country with pervasive surveillance laws, cooperating with a OS developer for anti-surveillance measures.

    Granted, I could see that from places with pervasive surveillance, a need arises for something that removes all that surveillance. But then, would governments not be harsh on that?














  • See: Yesilğoz, a Turkish liberal politician who betrayed the Socialist Party to work for the corrupt, big company party (VVD), and now claims to be a minister, despite effectively calling Douwe Bob’s refusal to have a pro-Israeli concert, “a normalisation of Jew hatred”.

    Fuck her, she’s not my minister. And when Douwe Bob got death threats due to HER words, she refused to cave in until the latest moment. Fuck that piss minister, bought by Israel’s genocidal lobby.

    I hate her and I think she is actively enabling antisemitism and fascism. And she indeed is! She tried to proclaim that antifascism is a danger.

    Fascists never tell you they become fascist. They start with declaring an enemy. And let us then make sure they will regret that, and reform to be good citizens.









  • Should also add that a lot of libertarians in reality tend to be more of the “I want the freedom to repress others” people, eg wanting homeschooling (which can increase abuse), opposing measures that would improve every person’s quality of life (such as universal healthcare) etc.

    Anarchists on the other hand, tend to be more often on the socialist or communist kind, in where they favour the abolition of hierarchy and thus favour an egalitarian society, by abolition of private (but not personal) property.