Any change brings some pain, that’s unavoidable, but it doesn’t mean it will not be interesting as well.

And also could influence CPU cache strategies.

If they scale that tech out of the lab, it would mean some redesign of the computer hardware, maybe unifying RAM and HD.

Your lack of hope/resignation is a tool against you (and against all of us).

I had panic attacks just before start working, and my productivity was quite low. I hope you don’t reach that kind of reaction before looking for help.

I watched some videos, but haven’t tried yet. Seems useful if you want to use a functionality that already exists.

I want Lemmy to grow, without corporations’ grip, and without centralization.

Bread plus water may be a way to speak beer.

“It’s good to be king” :/

São Paulo

Considering the ActivityPub protocol, they can create it’s own instance or even social media.

Why?

Look for GPUs with more memory. My choice is the AMD 7900 XTX with 24Gb.

I feel like it’s a set up for a joke.

I would advise therapy, for you to understand yourself better, and answer the why of this.

Nobody is stopping you though.

I never used Rust “professionally”, I always avoid lifetimes. Borrowing is easy, lifetimes are hell.

Now I’m thinking about it, “make sense” to not have sound in your dreams. As your eyes are shut down, keeping your ears available to detect danger seems an advantage to be selected. And that fits with my experience where the sounds I can remember were real.

But there are others known examples of sound inside dreams: musicians! Many songs were written in dreams:

• Yesterday (Beatles)
• Purple Haze (Jimi Hendrix) [Inspired by a dream, not “composed” in a dream]
• Sweet Dreams (Are made of this) (Eurythmics)
• Devil’s Trill Sonata (Tartini)

Edits: corrections

The final frontier will be Doom running inside Doom.

OP, it’s fine to believe in whatever you feel like it, and IMHO ghosts and aliens are better beliefs than some other options.

With that said, I think it would be better to say that you believe those things and use the “not 100%” as a justification.

There is no way to gather all evidence about any topic, so we need to define what is acceptable as “enough” evidence and what “make sense” according to what we know; at least when we (as a society) talk about science.

I think not even it’s creator is fluent in ithkuil.