See? Again, I’m informing protest-non-voters what they voted for. Ciao.

Lol funny how you try to turn voting into not voting, and not voting into … something else. Anyways, see article and remember, this is what you voted for protest-non-voters. Ciao.

The press release also requires each ministry, including public operators, to develop a plan by autumn 2026 addressing desktop systems, collaboration tools, antivirus software, AI, databases, virtualization, and network equipment.

If someone voted for Dems, this isn’t what they voted for.

Also sounds like you’re looking to blame. I am looking to inform protest-non-voters what they voted for. And yes this is what they voted for.

Sounds like you’re looking to find who’s responsible. I’m interested in informing protest-non-voters what they voted for.

This is what you voted for protest-non-voters.

Looks like left side has a decent park.

https://youtu.be/o0A9M5wHBA4

https://youtu.be/o0A9M5wHBA4

Jan. Iphone was launched June. Wondering if he thinking about dumb phones or BlackBerry with touch screen.

Damn, Hegseth is like Rabban.

I just watched a youtube video that they found a Roman shipwreck absolutely packed with lead ingots. They brought them up for use.

1800 light years away.

Is this how I learn about this? Is it actually closed again?

So you’re just boring?

Play this out:

1. Russia nukes the US.

2. In response, the US nukes Russia. Not just a little bit either, they nuke all population sites.

No “decapitation” strike is possible from either side. Any attack by either side is met by the other striking back, and again not just a little bit - all population sites. That is what mutually assured destruction is.

And maybe more if you need:

1. if you think the US nukes Russia, then:

2. surprise, Russia nukes the US back.

Once again, no decapitation strike is possible from either side. A strike by the US is met by Russia striking back. That is what mutually assured destruction is.

MAD literally works if either side starts nuking the other, regardless of the reason why. This is the whole basis of MAD.

Ok I’m really gonna peace out. You really need to do some reading.

First you said Russia, not the US, would do a preemptive nuclear attack. So this isn’t about Trump, it’s about Putin.

Second, Russia wouldn’t do it because of MAD. That’s the whole concept of MAD.

You’re making no sense, so I think I’m gonna peace out.

They consider Taiwan part of China. They would see nuking Taiwan as nuking their own left hand. Very unlikely.

MAD is when the other country can nuke you back. That doesn’t exist here. (As far as everyone knows.)