Lee Duna to Privacy [email protected]English • 1 year agoProton Mail Discloses User Data Leading to Arrest in Spainrestoreprivacy.comexternal-linkmessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1220arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1220arrow-down1external-linkProton Mail Discloses User Data Leading to Arrest in Spainrestoreprivacy.comLee Duna to Privacy [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square89fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoDid you read the story? Or are you just here to stir the pot and display your Proton Fanboi bona fides?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoI question if you’ve read the story. Its a very clear case that is painted in the story.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year ago Its a very clear case that is painted in the story. Indeed it is. The police asked and Proton provided. Very clear indeed. At last, something we can agree on.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoLike… They are required to do by law because its a terrorism case.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoThe pointis that the person is an idiot and Proton had to comply with a request about a terrorist.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoThe point is that Proton, a company that sells privacy, violated that trust, apparently without much of a fight. The Spanish police didn’t even allege that the person is a terrorist. I think we’re done here. We’re not even speaking the same language. Have a nice life.
minus-squareDiamond_AaronXGlinkfedilink1•1 year ago@CaptObvious @Mikufan if the user practiced proper opsec it wouldn’t be an issue. Proton provides privacy not anonymity. Those are 2 different things. The second requires opsec in the users end.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year ago if the user practiced proper opsec it wouldn’t be an issue Agreed Proton provides privacy not anonymity Anonymity most certainly is a part of privacy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/it-privacy/ https://epic.org/issues/democracy-free-speech/anonymity/ https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/09/05/anonymity-privacy-and-security-online/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy
Did you read the story? Or are you just here to stir the pot and display your Proton Fanboi bona fides?
I question if you’ve read the story. Its a very clear case that is painted in the story.
Indeed it is. The police asked and Proton provided. Very clear indeed.
At last, something we can agree on.
Like… They are required to do by law because its a terrorism case.
Questionable and not the point.
The pointis that the person is an idiot and Proton had to comply with a request about a terrorist.
The point is that Proton, a company that sells privacy, violated that trust, apparently without much of a fight.
The Spanish police didn’t even allege that the person is a terrorist.
I think we’re done here. We’re not even speaking the same language.
Have a nice life.
@CaptObvious @Mikufan if the user practiced proper opsec it wouldn’t be an issue. Proton provides privacy not anonymity. Those are 2 different things. The second requires opsec in the users end.
Agreed
Anonymity most certainly is a part of privacy.