@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 years agoMozilla officially opposes Web Enviroment Integrity API (DRM for web pages proposal from Google)github.commessage-square132fedilinkarrow-up11.42Karrow-down115cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11.41Karrow-down1external-linkMozilla officially opposes Web Enviroment Integrity API (DRM for web pages proposal from Google)github.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square132fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•2 years agowhy did you waste your time asking that question when you already knew the answer? It’s always the profits!!!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-22 years agoI get it costs money to develop accessibility, but you can’t rip off a blind man if he can’t navigate your sight. I truly don’t get it. Edit: site, not sight
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoThey’ve simply run the numbers and decided it would cost more to support the blind man’s access than they could get from plundering the blind man.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoI want to laugh but … well … I’m not crying YOU’RE CRYING
why did you waste your time asking that question when you already knew the answer?
It’s always the profits!!!
I get it costs money to develop accessibility, but you can’t rip off a blind man if he can’t navigate your sight. I truly don’t get it.
Edit: site, not sight
They’ve simply run the numbers and decided it would cost more to support the blind man’s access than they could get from plundering the blind man.
I want to laugh but … well … I’m not crying YOU’RE CRYING