• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2610 months ago

    Too bad this is an extremely rare use case, but yes this is exactly the INTENT of the second amendment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      910 months ago

      Does it actually work? Because I fear that it doesn’t and just gives cops/the state even more excuses to further militarize police in the long teem.

      I’m not antigun, but this seems like an arms race you can’t win.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1710 months ago

        It does. Armed peaceful protesters don’t get hassled by the police. These are armed peaceful protesters and they were not hassled. It worked for the black panthers. Cops only brutalize the weak.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          910 months ago

          Well I’m not sure it worked that well for Fred Hampton or the MOVE guys.

          There’s always a danger of escalation, and the boys in blue have no upper limit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          310 months ago

          Armed peaceful protesters don’t get hassled by the police.

          There were quite a few shoot outs between panthers and cops, no? Some even argue that the increasing use of “swat” was, in part, because of black panthers.

          Again, I’m not speaking out against armed groups, but it seems a bit romantized to say “armed protesters don’t get hasseled”…

        • 0^2
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          I’m pretty sure there are some statistics on the mental profiles of cops the people who end up becoming them being people who enjoy power.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -610 months ago

      The INTENT of the second amendment was protect the states’ militias from being disarmed by the feds. So that enslavers like Washington could rest assured that his slave state of Virginia wouldn’t be liberated by the feds