Roflmasterbigpimp to Lemmy [email protected] • 8 months agoMaybe this is better for everyonelocklemmy.worldimagemessage-square448fedilinkarrow-up1588arrow-down198
arrow-up1490arrow-down1imageMaybe this is better for everyonelocklemmy.worldRoflmasterbigpimp to Lemmy [email protected] • 8 months agomessage-square448fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•8 months agoright. it’s simply not scoped to support the claim tha being vegan is 30% cheaper
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish1•8 months agoWhat they claimed was “a whole foods plant-based diet is 30% cheaper.” Which is factually supported by the study, even if you’d prefer to interpret it to mean something else
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•8 months ago What they claimed was “a whole foods plant-based diet is 30% cheaper.” Which is factually supported by the study …for a limited segment of the population.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-28 months agoIt’s actually not speaking about the personal costs born by consumers, it’s talking about the cost of purchasing food for the diet. As I said, if the paper was discussing the systemic hurtles and personal choices of consumers it would be a different paper, saying a different thing.
right. it’s simply not scoped to support the claim tha being vegan is 30% cheaper
What they claimed was “a whole foods plant-based diet is 30% cheaper.”
Which is factually supported by the study, even if you’d prefer to interpret it to mean something else
…for a limited segment of the population.
It’s actually not speaking about the personal costs born by consumers, it’s talking about the cost of purchasing food for the diet.
As I said, if the paper was discussing the systemic hurtles and personal choices of consumers it would be a different paper, saying a different thing.