Sjmarf to Programmer [email protected] • 3 months agoLDACsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up1849arrow-down14
arrow-up1845arrow-down1imageLDACsh.itjust.worksSjmarf to Programmer [email protected] • 3 months agomessage-square117fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink40•3 months agoBluetooth as a whole is kind of a mess if we’re being honest.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish22•3 months agoThat’s what happens when you have a 25 year old protocol and try to maintain backwards compatibility through all of the versions.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•edit-23 months agoThe world of audio would be more of a mess if Bluetooth was developed scrapped and replaced according to what seems to be your recommendations. I’m glad they did it the way they did. It’s not time for change. Just alternatives for snobs.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink12•3 months agoCan we name a more poorly implemented protocol? Probably. One used as much as Bluetooth? Probably not.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•3 months agoComes from being a compromise “standard”. The name says it all, being named after a king that brought multiple tribes together.
Bluetooth as a whole is kind of a mess if we’re being honest.
That’s what happens when you have a 25 year old protocol and try to maintain backwards compatibility through all of the versions.
The world of audio would be more of a mess if Bluetooth was developed scrapped and replaced according to what seems to be your recommendations. I’m glad they did it the way they did.
It’s not time for change. Just alternatives for snobs.
Can we name a more poorly implemented protocol? Probably. One used as much as Bluetooth? Probably not.
SMTP?
NAT
Comes from being a compromise “standard”. The name says it all, being named after a king that brought multiple tribes together.