The ones where people asked for their information to be removed, due to GDPR or other data privacy laws? Sure does seem like a different situation to me
In this case, I believe the screenshot is depicting DeepSeek (made by China, which vehemently denies the massacre at Tiananmen square) as whitewashing history.
I wonder if the censoring is on the open source self hosted model? The app runs Deepseek on Chinese servers so it makes sense that it would have censoring there, but what about on the actual offline model you can download?
Are people forgetting that there is a list of names that chatgpt can’t talk about?
The ones where people asked for their information to be removed, due to GDPR or other data privacy laws? Sure does seem like a different situation to me
Rather people that sued OpenAI or something like that.
In this case, I believe the screenshot is depicting DeepSeek (made by China, which vehemently denies the massacre at Tiananmen square) as whitewashing history.
China’s official narrative doesn’t deny that something happened on that date.
They paint it as the protestors’ fault. They say that the army broke up a dangerous riot.
Give it another 60 or so years. It took the US Justice Department over 100 years to “Review and Evaluate” the Tulsa massacre.
I wonder if the censoring is on the open source self hosted model? The app runs Deepseek on Chinese servers so it makes sense that it would have censoring there, but what about on the actual offline model you can download?
It’s my understanding that the open source deepseek does not include the data and you’d have to feed it your own data.
What chatgpt does is irrelevant. This is still a problem.
both are a problem
Yes but what chatgpt does has no impact on how bad what deepseek does actually is.
Muh stock