• ☂️-
    link
    fedilink
    813 months ago

    the day gaben dies and the company falls into the grubby hands of investors, its over.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      363 months ago

      Valve is a private company, so depending on who owns a majority of the shares, not much might change after Gabens earthly demise.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Private investors are (usually, and theoretically) more “long-term” motivated than the public markets. Day traders and rotating board members love quarterly boosts even if it implodes the company, but with private equity, passing a bag of shit to someone else isn’t so easy, and desires aren’t so fickle.

        Hence I suspect you’re right.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63 months ago

          Can you give same examples of such privately owned companies which are long term focussed?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        113 months ago

        It’s wild to me how few people understand that private companies have shareholders too

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I am not sure how to interpret your response. Do you mean I do not know that Valve as a private company does have shareholders?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            93 months ago

            What he means is, when gaben our lord an saviour dies, his majority shares ownership will be transferred to his inheritors.

            The question “do they want to own and do they understand Valve or just see a big pile of cash?” will be answered then and there.

            Which can very well result in an IPO.

    • fmstrat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 months ago

      My understanding was that a large percentage of Valve is employee owned. Would love to know if that’s true or not.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That just means that buying it spreads the money to slightly more people. They’re practically just as easy to acquire.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          43 months ago

          It also means that more people have to be willing to sell (or that if only a few sell, investors hold less power)