• Dark Arc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -13 months ago

    This is a bad take.

    Paywalls are the norm of traditional journalism. People got so used to a bunch of spammy, ad-fed, click bait journalism and now many are not willing to pay for good articles.

    I wish there was a better way to discuss these kinds of articles. There are sometimes gift links which are best for smaller group discussions… But nobody’s found a model that isn’t the mess that is ads that also allows “free viewing.”

    • southsamurai
      link
      fedilink
      03 months ago

      Eh, newspapers amd magazines had ads, they were just easier to skip

      • Dark Arc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        They also had subscriptions… And paywalls… You had to buy them from a newspaper stand or subscribe to have the paperboy deliver them…

        • southsamurai
          link
          fedilink
          03 months ago

          Yes, I’m aware. That’s an extension of what you said that I responded to.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      Paywalls are the norm of traditional journalism. People got so used to a bunch of spammy, ad-fed, click bait journalism and now many are not willing to pay for good articles.

      Huh. You’re not wrong. Newspapers were classic user-fee newsfeeds.

      But you could give away your paper when you were done. Is that early BitTorrent?

      • Dark Arc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        I don’t know; it’s one of those weird things where digital “cost to copy” being cheap really makes things problematic.

        Unlike BitTorrent you were giving away your access to that item and possibly never getting it back; we don’t really have a standard way of doing stuff like that in the digital era. The closest thing we have is very clunky, greedy, and intrusive DRM systems.