nifty to [email protected] • 3 months agoTwo sides of the same shit coinlemmy.worldimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down13
arrow-up1-1arrow-down1imageTwo sides of the same shit coinlemmy.worldnifty to [email protected] • 3 months agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•edit-23 months agoLow tier garbage rant about revolutionaries vs reformists. It’s the equivalent of a 19th century reddit rant complaining that people don’t want to bow down to authority until we’re magically all ready.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•3 months agoHow was it wrong? Use specific citations from the text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•3 months agoNo. Theory is for idiots, time would be better spent on praxis than sitting around circle jerking about what we would do.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•3 months agoAuthoritarianism is wrong yet you’re correct without any room for discussion?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-23 months agoWould you have a discussion in favour of racism or homophobia? I don’t engage JAQing off.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•3 months agoBigotry is wrong because innocent people are presumed to be evil or guilty based on a presupposition Give me the same line of reasoning against the text, just one, reference it directly
minus-squareComrade SpoodlinkfedilinkEnglish-1•3 months agoEngels was a bourgeoisie cunt that doesn’t understand what the word “authority” means.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•3 months agoCan you elaborate on how he was wrong with specific citations from the text?
minus-squareComrade SpoodlinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoHere’s a video full of them. I am done and fulfilled my end of this interaction. I will not fall victim to tankie sealioning. https://youtu.be/sexImJU4-Oo
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•3 months agoCan you personally give me one example? Tell me roughly where it is in the text? Just one
Thoughts on “On Authority” by Engels?
Low tier garbage rant about revolutionaries vs reformists.
It’s the equivalent of a 19th century reddit rant complaining that people don’t want to bow down to authority until we’re magically all ready.
How was it wrong? Use specific citations from the text
No.
Theory is for idiots, time would be better spent on praxis than sitting around circle jerking about what we would do.
Authoritarianism is wrong yet you’re correct without any room for discussion?
Would you have a discussion in favour of racism or homophobia?
I don’t engage JAQing off.
Bigotry is wrong because innocent people are presumed to be evil or guilty based on a presupposition
Give me the same line of reasoning against the text, just one, reference it directly
Engels was a bourgeoisie cunt that doesn’t understand what the word “authority” means.
Can you elaborate on how he was wrong with specific citations from the text?
Here’s a video full of them. I am done and fulfilled my end of this interaction. I will not fall victim to tankie sealioning.
https://youtu.be/sexImJU4-Oo
Can you personally give me one example? Tell me roughly where it is in the text? Just one