TL;DR: The CyberTruck is 17 times more likely to have a fire fatality than a Ford Pinto

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    39
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    For those who don’t know about the Pinto:

    In 1978, Ford recalled 1.5 million Pintos because the fuel tank was prone to rupturing in rear-end collisions at speeds of 20 mph or higher. This was the largest recall in automotive history at the time.

    https://www.tortmuseum.org/ford-pinto/

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        122 months ago

        As a European who knew nothing about Ford Pinto, I thought they made fun of how cars always explode in movies.

            • Cosmic Cleric
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              It would have been fine, I was half doing that out of comedy, half doing it out of just shining a spotlight on some automated process that always adds exactly one downvote to every comment being added.

            • ArxCyberwolf
              link
              fedilink
              02 months ago

              Pointing out someone downvoting you attracts more downvotes. Don’t do that if you don’t want more.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 months ago

      To be more specific, the fuel tank was placed between the rear bumper and rear differential. In a rear end collision, the tank would get sandwiched by the bumper and differential, which had bolts protruding out the back and would pierce the tank, spilling fuel onto the road.

      Additionally, rear end collisions would bend the frame in a way that jammed the doors so you couldnt get out.

      They figured that people would die and their cost benefit analysis assumed a certain number of deaths and lawsuits. The resulting recall and larger than expected number of deaths and lawsuits made it a huge loss for them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        82 months ago

        Wherever I’m going, I’ll be there to apply the formula. I’ll keep the secret intact.
        It’s simple arithmetic.
        It’s a story problem.
        If a new car built by my company leaves Chicago traveling west at 60 miles per hour, and the rear differential locks up, and the car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside, does my company initiate a recall?
        You take the population of vehicles in the field (A) and multiple it by the probable rate of failure (B), then multiply the result by the average cost of an out-of-court settlement ©.
        A times B times C equals X. This is what it will cost if we don’t initiate a recall.
        If X is greater than the cost of a recall, we recall the cars and no one gets hurt.
        If X is less than the cost of a recall, then we don’t recall.

        Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 months ago

        That design is even worse than I realized. It’s fucked that didn’t put them out of business honestly