@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agoThat explains a lotmander.xyzimagemessage-square122fedilinkarrow-up1781arrow-down115
arrow-up1766arrow-down1imageThat explains a lotmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square122fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agoI think the bigger they are faster tge evaporate. They lose mass at some ratio between their surface and mass.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agoExactly the opposite. The bigger one is, the less it evaporates. Time required to evaporate scales with Mass^3
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoThat’s true the constant rate I mentioned would vary with the surface area of the black hole as it changes but the volume would increase exponentially faster
I think the bigger they are faster tge evaporate. They lose mass at some ratio between their surface and mass.
Exactly the opposite. The bigger one is, the less it evaporates. Time required to evaporate scales with Mass^3
That’s true the constant rate I mentioned would vary with the surface area of the black hole as it changes but the volume would increase exponentially faster