• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 months ago

    Seems the problem is beyond finding a ‘cure-all’. Multiple strategies will be necessary.

    • NSRXN
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      I’d prefer an effective strategy

        • NSRXN
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          less garbage isn’t created regardless of whether you or I buy fish

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            An individual abstaining from owning slaves didn’t reduce slave populations either. Think they were as dumb and ineffectual as I am? Fine.

            • NSRXN
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              so you are moving the goalposts from efficacy to ethics. that’s fine, but I don’t believe eating fish is unethical.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                Multitudes of alternatives (plants!) are less cruel and harmful to our planet. Do you disagree?

                • NSRXN
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  I don’t think eating fish is cruel, nor inherently harmful to the planet. the methods of fishing that have developed, and the scale of modern fishing are problems, but for me to choose to abstain from fish would not mitigate the situation.