@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • edit-22 months agofuck thismander.xyzimagemessage-square701fedilinkarrow-up12.14Karrow-down155file-text
arrow-up12.08Karrow-down1imagefuck thismander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • edit-22 months agomessage-square701fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish21•2 months agoThe constitution also didn’t say “the president shall give a shit about the law” Rookie mistake, IMO
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•2 months agoIt literally did, minus your contemporary idiom: he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, (It’s called the “take care clause” and is part of Article II, Section 3, in case anybody wants to look it up.) Not that it matters anymore, after Trump v. United States.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-22 months agoIt was the first time they were writing a constitution. Obviously they were rookies
minus-squareCethinlinkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-22 months agoSecond. The Articles of Confederation was first and failed.
The constitution also didn’t say “the president shall give a shit about the law”
Rookie mistake, IMO
It literally did, minus your contemporary idiom:
(It’s called the “take care clause” and is part of Article II, Section 3, in case anybody wants to look it up.)
Not that it matters anymore, after Trump v. United States.
It was the first time they were writing a constitution. Obviously they were rookies
Second. The Articles of Confederation was first and failed.