• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    552 months ago

    It will be a shit show until Canada and the rest of the western world work out agreements independent of the US.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      232 months ago

      Isolating a fascist power with the strongest military in the world doesn’t work. Eventually they work up the balls to use it.

      Every nation should be prepared for what happens when the purge of the US military and government is complete and only loyalists hold power.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        162 months ago

        Given that there are no ideal moves in any direction, I feel that standing up to the bully is the only option on the table. They failed to do that in 1939.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        92 months ago

        And another thing. Its America’s job to police this mess, they installed him either directly or indirectly. The rest of the world didn’t ask or vote for this dangerous toddler.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                22 months ago

                Don’t fret… I have absolutely no expectations that Americans can pull out of this power dive. I just hope that most of the damage will be self inflicted.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          No joke, I can see UK and France offering nuclear retaliation response promise to Canada, outside of NATO. I think trump really is dumb enough to start real war with for example Canada. NATO is dead, rest of the west needs to make similar protection agreements without USA, besides NATO , for when shit really hits the fan (I think it will, it’s a matter of when, not if).

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              From article 5 from the NATO treaty actually. It states that it applies to attacks from external actors, i.e. non-members.

              Edit: the article or nato treaty doesn’t state it that explicitly actually. But a quick google show that it’s at least the consensus interpretation

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                It has been hotly debated, mostly in regards to Greece and Türkiye, who have been at each other’s throats for decades. In that case, the aggressor likely wouldn’t be obvious and both are likely to claim article 5. Their relations to other NATO members are also a lot more ambiguous, some favoring one, some the other.

                In the case of a rogue USA attacking Canada, or Denmark, I believe the case would be a lot clearer.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 months ago

                it states that it applies to attacks from external actors, i.e. non-members

                Which America would be if they leave NATO…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      222 months ago

      Over here in the EU we still need gas and oil. I’d much rather import it from Canada than from Qatar or some other middle eastern dictatorship.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 months ago

      We’re already doing that. EVERYBODY is doing that. every western nation is doing their best to cut America out of their trading deals. Donnie has seriously fucked America over.