ekZepp to Fediverse [email protected]English • 2 months agoSomething to agree upon.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square120fedilinkarrow-up1625arrow-down126
arrow-up1599arrow-down1imageSomething to agree upon.lemmy.worldekZepp to Fediverse [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square120fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months agoYeah tbh if it were just violent content I’d be fine with that. I still don’t trust Reddit as a platform anymore, but I’d be 100% understanding of the rule. Banned/Removed-by-Admin content, though? That’s absurd. That’s way too broad.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish14•2 months ago“Violent content” could also be videos of officer misconduct, and there’s the whole can of worms of what “promoting violence” means.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-22 months agoGuarantee something like posting a picture of Luigi will be considered banned content promoting violence. Edit: Called it
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months agoWell tbf most of those are unless you’re saying “I don’t think this is the killer” or resharing a news article. He’s not celebrated for pacifism.
Yeah tbh if it were just violent content I’d be fine with that. I still don’t trust Reddit as a platform anymore, but I’d be 100% understanding of the rule.
Banned/Removed-by-Admin content, though? That’s absurd. That’s way too broad.
“Violent content” could also be videos of officer misconduct, and there’s the whole can of worms of what “promoting violence” means.
Fair
Guarantee something like posting a picture of Luigi will be considered banned content promoting violence.
Edit: Called it
Well tbf most of those are unless you’re saying “I don’t think this is the killer” or resharing a news article. He’s not celebrated for pacifism.