• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Kitty is probably the best terminal emulator I’ve ever tried out… It even made me drop Tmux as multiplexer on my stupid Mac !

    I only have basic use case right now, nothing complex but customization seems way above others.

    The full OSC52 integration with micro for copy/past over SSH and taking up the terminal clipboard was also a game changer (nearly dropped micro because of this…)

    I only scratched the surface and have only basic usage and still I can’t believe one single person is behind this project (I think?).

    • juipeltje
      link
      fedilink
      12 months ago

      I like it mainly because of the image protocol and supporting both x11 and wayland. I still have alacritty installed as well because i like how damn fast it is. If alacritty had proper image support i’d probably only be using alacritty, but they are both great terminal emulators.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        02 months ago

        I recently switched from alacritty to ghostty as I wanted image support as ghostty implements the kitty protocol for it. Ghostty seems as fast as alacrity to me, but with better support. It even has a tmux type replacement, although I haven’t used it as I don’t need it with sway doing that for me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 months ago

          Ghostty is fast? It takes like 2 full seconds to open and I’m not even exaggerating. Kitty, Alacritty and foot take only a few microseconds to launch. I feel the same in regards to Alacritty, I’d use it as default if it had image support. For now I’m using foot.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            02 months ago

            Something wrong there, Ghostty is just as quick for me. Are you using an older PC?

            Both load for me in milliseconds, even with fastfetch stuck in my startup.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Don’t know about old but definitely not slow. My PC has a ryzen 5 3600 and RTX 3060. All terminals have a fast startup time except for Ghostty.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                ryzen 5 3600

                Yeah thats what I would call old now, lol.

                There is 100% something wrong with your Ghostty.

                Heres a shitty gif I made to show you how fast Ghostty, Alacritty and Konsole is on my PC, all way less than a second and I am running a ton of background crap including different 4k animated wallpapers. Gif

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    02 months ago

                    Its six years old, that’s starting to get on a bit now for a processor that was never anywhere near top of the line from AMD when it was new.

                    I think if you are trying to bling our your desktop and not expecting it to impact performance from an older, less powerful setup then generally speaking you are going to have a bad time. You should be pitching your desktop experience based on what your hardware can handle, there are plenty of terminal options available depending on what you need, just like there are plenty of WM/DMs if you have a lower spec machine.

                    Having said that, it was pretty damn obvious that there something wrong with ghostty on their setup, and its misleading to say that ghostly is just bad because of that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          How am I supposed to get previews working in Yazi then? It’s not 1969 anymore. If you don’t like it stay on tty.