@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agoDunning-Krugerlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square242fedilinkarrow-up11.77Karrow-down161
arrow-up11.71Karrow-down1imageDunning-Krugerlemmy.dbzer0.com@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square242fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish24•1 month agoYou can even be incorrect on a subject you have expertise in.
minus-squarebountygiver [any]linkfedilinkEnglish12•1 month agothat’s why we have peer reviews for new findings by experts.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 month agoExactly, imagine if we threw away the entire peer review process and made it about, “Well I have a PhD! Checkmate.” We’d descend into a dark age for science.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•1 month agoExperts often disagree. If it were that easy, everything would be solved. We wouldn’t need so much research or so many universities.
You can even be incorrect on a subject you have expertise in.
that’s why we have peer reviews for new findings by experts.
Exactly, imagine if we threw away the entire peer review process and made it about, “Well I have a PhD! Checkmate.”
We’d descend into a dark age for science.
Experts often disagree.
If it were that easy, everything would be solved. We wouldn’t need so much research or so many universities.