Track_Shovel to Lemmy [email protected]English • 1 month agoHexadecimalslrpnk.netimagemessage-square95fedilinkarrow-up1597arrow-down115
arrow-up1582arrow-down1imageHexadecimalslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel to Lemmy [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square95fedilink
minus-squaremacniellinkfedilink3•1 month agoits the capital city of China :D you know, where something happend on a specific square in the specific year of 1984.
minus-squaremacniellinkfedilink4•edit-21 month agooh… sorry, you are right. but you will get the same result.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•1 month agoYou think DeepSeek won’t talk about one of the largest cities in the world?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink11•1 month agoWell shit. I thought it was BS too. But damn if it didn’t abort after a little deep thinking on the Olympics.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•1 month agoYou know, you could’ve just tested it yourself lol
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-4•1 month agoWhy would I do that when the Internet will correct me? Seems like a really weird line to draw. I guess they got bored of people trying to trick it into talking about Tianamen?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 month agoIt was just funny the way you dismissed the claim without testing it yourself. But it’s almost too silly to be true
minus-squaremacniellinkfedilink2•1 month agoOh it does… but then it will remove everything and states that it’s out of scope.
its the capital city of China :D
you know, where something happend on a specific square in the specific year of 1984.
You missed the g.
oh… sorry, you are right.
but you will get the same result.
You think DeepSeek won’t talk about one of the largest cities in the world?
Well shit. I thought it was BS too. But damn if it didn’t abort after a little deep thinking on the Olympics.
You know, you could’ve just tested it yourself lol
Why would I do that when the Internet will correct me?
Seems like a really weird line to draw. I guess they got bored of people trying to trick it into talking about Tianamen?
It was just funny the way you dismissed the claim without testing it yourself. But it’s almost too silly to be true
Oh it does… but then it will remove everything and states that it’s out of scope.
That would be 4 june 1989, not 9 june 1984 sir ;)
My life is a lie :o
Thanks for the correction.