@[email protected] to [email protected]English • edit-21 month agoMicrosoft Proposes "Hornet" Security Module For The Linux Kernellore.kernel.orgmessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up190arrow-down16file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up184arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft Proposes "Hornet" Security Module For The Linux Kernellore.kernel.org@[email protected] to [email protected]English • edit-21 month agomessage-square41fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•1 month agoIf the executable binary has to be signed with a key, similar to the module signing key, Microsoft could sign their binaries This, along with secureboot, would prevent the owner of the machine from running eBPF programs Microsoft doesn’t want you to run, even with root
minus-squareMagiilarolinkfedilink8•1 month agoYeah, that’s why I am against Microsoft Keys on my systems
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•1 month agoI wasn’t trying to give a positive side, I was just explaining why Microsoft wants the feature
If the executable binary has to be signed with a key, similar to the module signing key, Microsoft could sign their binaries
This, along with secureboot, would prevent the owner of the machine from running eBPF programs Microsoft doesn’t want you to run, even with root
Yeah, that’s why I am against Microsoft Keys on my systems
I fail to see the positive side of that…
deleted by creator
I wasn’t trying to give a positive side, I was just explaining why Microsoft wants the feature