The fact that you felt the need to write out - at length - your extremely one-sided and obviously self serving account of the argument makes me even more convinced that you lost an argument and are extremely salty about it.
I wrote it out for other not to you. I have zero interest in entertaining your incessant need to inject yourself into a conversation so you could deliver snarky oneliners. Which is also why I’m not going to address anything you’ve written here because it’s nothing more than a compilation of your one-liners. Give me anything of actual substance and I’ll give you an actual response.
Again, no. You can’t address what he said, so you’re making up your own strawman.
Ad hominem
What, specifically, are you accusing him of doing wrong? Sounds like you just don’t like him disagreeing with you.
Ad hominem
OP has explicitly said otherwise, but you’ve already established you feel entitled to tell people their own opinions.
Yes, because OP gave him the benefit of doubt because OP thought he’s not a bad actor. But not that it matter because the second part of your one-liner goes back to Ad hominem.
Any actual examples though?
Besides the one I mentioned? Well there’s also the one where he’s pushed about being critical of Russia’s actions he deflects to America being worse.
Uhuh. Still seems like you’re the one arguing in bad faith.
Ad hominem
You have indeed demonstrated that your were arguing in bad faith from the start and that you’re just salty someone disagreed with you.
Okay. I looked up the definition of ad hominem and I came to a conclusion, it’s still ad hominem. Maybe you should learn what is it and then come back when you’ve actually got something to say.
I wrote it out for other not to you. I have zero interest in entertaining your incessant need to inject yourself into a conversation so you could deliver snarky oneliners. Which is also why I’m not going to address anything you’ve written here because it’s nothing more than a compilation of your one-liners. Give me anything of actual substance and I’ll give you an actual response.
I rest my case: you just consider anyone disagreeing with you in any way to be unacceptable.
Sure.
Ad hominem
Ad hominem
Ad hominem
Yes, because OP gave him the benefit of doubt because OP thought he’s not a bad actor. But not that it matter because the second part of your one-liner goes back to Ad hominem.
Besides the one I mentioned? Well there’s also the one where he’s pushed about being critical of Russia’s actions he deflects to America being worse.
Ad hominem
Ad hominem conclusion.
Where is the substance?
Incorrect, it is not an ad hominem.
Again, no it isn’t.
Do you even know what an ad hominem is?
Are you saying that OP has changed their mind?
Still not what an ad hominem is. Or a one liner for that matter…
No, an actual example
That’s not an example though. That’s literally just him stating his opinion.
Can you actually learn what “ad hominem” means and come and try again?
Okay. I looked up the definition of ad hominem and I came to a conclusion, it’s still ad hominem. Maybe you should learn what is it and then come back when you’ve actually got something to say.