@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 2 days agoJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1728arrow-down18cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1720arrow-down1imageJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.ml@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 2 days agomessage-square52fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareOrvornlinkfedilink81•2 days agoSomeone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a… code
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink37•2 days agoBut it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish24•2 days agoThat’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
minus-squareNatanaellinkfedilink20•2 days agoHow to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-21 day agoPeople could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•2 days agoWe don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.
Someone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a… code
But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
That’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
People could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
A codegrammar?
We don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.