alphacyberranger to [email protected]English • 5 days agoAverage LinkedIn usersh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1462arrow-down15
arrow-up1457arrow-down1imageAverage LinkedIn usersh.itjust.worksalphacyberranger to [email protected]English • 5 days agomessage-square48fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•edit-24 days agoHow the fuck does that graph even works?! Shows the very left of the graph, then says you’re in the top? Doesn’t make any sense. Edit : clearly I belong in the top 85% too. I guess I confused % and percentile!
minus-squaremy_hat_stinkslinkfedilink13•4 days agoIt says top 85%. In a room with 100 people the 85th smartest person would be in the top 85% but they’d also be in the bottom 15%.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•4 days ago85% of people have that IQ or higher. Maybe they do it this way so those that don’t get it don’t feel sad about the results?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•4 days agoi hate how IQ tests use both percentages and percentiles for the results
How the fuck does that graph even works?! Shows the very left of the graph, then says you’re in the top? Doesn’t make any sense. Edit : clearly I belong in the top 85% too. I guess I confused % and percentile!
It says top 85%. In a room with 100 people the 85th smartest person would be in the top 85% but they’d also be in the bottom 15%.
I am going to believe this is comedy gold.
85% of people have that IQ or higher. Maybe they do it this way so those that don’t get it don’t feel sad about the results?
i hate how IQ tests use both percentages and percentiles for the results
I just realised that was my mistake yeah -_-;
Top 85% could mean bottom 15% (±1%)