@[email protected] to politics @lemmy.world • 25 days agoHealth Care Giants Say It’s Too Costly To Protect Your Privacywww.levernews.comexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkHealth Care Giants Say It’s Too Costly To Protect Your Privacywww.levernews.com@[email protected] to politics @lemmy.world • 25 days agomessage-square19fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•25 days agoI’d argue that you shifted the goal posts when you suggested that civil fines would be a possible path to punishment. That’s all I was responding to. I never suggested that pardons would come into it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•edit-225 days agoYou’re now arguing over a claim you say you never made, while responding to a correction I gave to someone else’s hypothetical about pardons. So either you misunderstood the original thread and jumped in sideways, or you’re walking it back now. Either way: Pardons don’t cover HIPAA fines. HIPAA is still law, even if enforcement is selective. Doomerism isn’t analysis. This isn’t dodgeball, it’s policy. Stay sharp or stay quiet.
I’d argue that you shifted the goal posts when you suggested that civil fines would be a possible path to punishment.
That’s all I was responding to. I never suggested that pardons would come into it.
You’re now arguing over a claim you say you never made, while responding to a correction I gave to someone else’s hypothetical about pardons.
So either you misunderstood the original thread and jumped in sideways, or you’re walking it back now. Either way:
Pardons don’t cover HIPAA fines.
HIPAA is still law, even if enforcement is selective.
Doomerism isn’t analysis.
This isn’t dodgeball, it’s policy. Stay sharp or stay quiet.