• trevor (he/they)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 days ago

    Come and get your recycled franchise, nostalgia-bait slop! We can’t be fucked to pay any creative talent to write stories about anything new or interesting, so here are some of your favorite characters’ zombies that we acquired being dangled in front of you.


    I’m about y’all, but I’m really looking forward to Barbie 9 and Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 days ago

      There are no new stories. Haven’t been for millennia.
      Stop asking for re-skinned old stories.

      • snooggums
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 days ago

        There is a difference between recycling an existing story by re-imagining it and throwing out generic slop with a nostalgia filter. The Terminator and Halloween are the same story if you ignore the details. Indiana Jones was an homage to the old adventure serials.

        Having the same overall structure can make something the same story at the surface level, but how it is implemented is what makes it fresh and original. Nostalgia bait is not putting the effort into making something new and fun, but instead focusing on how they can cram member berries in so people can remember the better movie as a distraction from the slop they are watching.

        Not all movies with nostalgia moments are nostalgia bait either. Good sequels exist too.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 days ago

          Exactly true. But celebrating a new coat of paint, instead of cleaning the old paint, is kind of silly. That’s my point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 days ago

      I agree with your sentiment, but the studies show people will go see what’s familiar, even if it doesn’t end up being very good. It’s a safer bet for studios

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 days ago

        And everybody knows that going for the safe bet is the sure-fire formula for a classic that will return profits to the studio for decades.

      • trevor (he/they)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 days ago

        Absolutely, and that’s the problem. Studios optimize for low-risk because art is just an investment vehicle for them, which is directly at-odds with what art actually should be: creative expression.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 days ago

        Well in the original saying it three times again puts him back in the model. So really, looking at it, t looks like they summoned him and put him back a couple time. He would currently be summoned and 2 more away from being put back.