To be clear, the current tariff execution is reckless and poorly planned. But I hear a lot of total tariff opposition from the same people who demand we continue to escalate with China over control of Taiwan, up to a potential hot war.

So what’s the plan? Western economies were brought to their knees during just a momentary interruption in shipping during the pandemic. How do you wage a war with a country that does all of your manufacturing? China could defeat most western countries without firing a single shot, just by cutting off their access to Chinese exports.

If you don’t support tariffs to bring back manufacturing jobs domestically, how do you think we could make it through a war with our manufacturing partners? I can’t reconcile the two ideas, and I don’t understand how some of y’all are.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    214 days ago

    There was no war with manufacturing partners. Trump started one with his silly plan. He doesn’t understand tariffs at all, and that’ll be to the detriment of the average Joe. Things will be more expensive to produce (the US relies heavily on imports and doesn’t have a strong manufacturing base for most products). Raw materials will still need to be imported, and you can bet the importers will charge the US more for them in retaliation.

    The best solution was to let sleeping dogs lie, but the Fantascist wouldn’t understand this. He’s either an economically clueless buffoon or is shorting the market so his ilk can benefit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      214 days ago

      Even if tariffs worked the way Trump wanted and it magically brings all this manufacturing back to the USA, it will still cause extreme inflation in the USA. The reason foreign goods are so cheap? Dirt cheap labor. To manufacture these goods in the USA would mean orders of magnitude higher labor costs and ultimately orders of magnitude higher price of goods to the consumer. Inflation.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      114 days ago

      the US relies heavily on imports and doesn’t have a strong manufacturing base for most products

      And that’s the problem Trump is seemingly trying to fix. I agree he’s not going about the right way. His approach is a kind of clumsy shock therapy, that will cause chaos in at least the short term and may or may not produce the desired result, eventually, but reshoring production and rebuilding a strong manufacturing base for the US is a goal shared by the Democrats, as well.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        I think saying it is short term is very hopeful. The ripples of this will be felt for many years. You can’t suddenly magic manufacturing infrastructure and supply chains into existence. It’s a long road to do that with seemingly no plan in the interim, and I’ve no doubt that tariffs will be changed many times at his whim, so it’s hard for anyone to set up any manufacturing business when they can’t get a solid grip on their costs, given the need to import raw materials and components.

        Making items on home soil for your own market is a good idea but it takes a lot of time, and the general feeling in the rest of the world is that countries will want to import fewer US goods, so export markets for the US will dwindle, and I doubt there is enough buying power in the US to get the growth he wants, particularly when these products made on US soil will undoubtedly cost more to the consumer than they currently do, and with stagnating wages and high cost of living as part of the equation.

        I’m sure he’ll start selling to his Russian buddies when the time comes, but doubt that will be enough to fix his mess.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          114 days ago

          I agree, rebuilding a US manufacturing base will require competent planning and management, but those are bad words here in the US, when it comes to the economy. To many Americans, competent, central economic management, direction, and planning is tyrannical rule by elites. To those Americans, Trump is the antidote. You might point out that there is significant irony in that. I agree, it is ironic, but that irony is completely lost on many millions of Americans.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            -214 days ago

            I agree that a centrally planned economy controlled by the elites would be tyranny. It needs to be controlled by local worker councils.

            But that’s communism, and a dealbreaker for many people, regardless of whether it’s better.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      -314 days ago

      But this issue predates Trump. Trump is starting a trade war, but Biden was escalating militarily with China. Both seem like very, very bad ideas.