I mean, if you read the NYT article, it is nothing that I believe should not have been assumed. The people providing the non-human resources are actively in on the decision making, when something doesn’t work, they move to stronger weapons/tactics. The idea that this is “scandalous” is weird, this is all just like business as usual, for anyone in a war. Why would anyone assume NATO wasn’t involved in calling the shots, and making decisions to, as they would hope, win?

I am against the russian side of this, like a lot, but this is just another tuesday type of stuff.