• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1618 days ago

    I liked your comment, but there is a lot more space that could be regained for pedestrians as well if we cyclists took only the space we needed. Car infrastructure is easily converted into one, but not into the other and asphalt causes heat islands.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      918 days ago

      Plus, roads are important for the people who can’t walk or cycle as well as for emergency services. Goods can’t all be transported by bike, either. Of course, that doesn’t require multiple lanes. Part should be kept, part turned into small green spaces to compensate for the environmental effect of the road, and part should be used for separate cycling and walking spaces. It becomes a bit more complex with streets that aren’t big enough for all that, of course.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        617 days ago

        And with decreased car use comes increased accesibility and speed for emergency vehicles and essential transport. And if we remove street parking, there will easily be enough space for cycling and walking space. Did you know all parking spaces in the US take up the same surface as the whole of connecticut?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          117 days ago

          Sure, but I was replying to a comment thread about replacing roads and highways with cycling infrastructure.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            117 days ago

            They were piggybacking off you, saying there’s even more space to be gained once the usage of cars goes down

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              117 days ago

              I’m autistic and always grateful for comments like this, thanks! Sometimes I genuinely don’t get it.