Originally Posted By u/transcendent167 At 2025-04-16 02:46:43 PM | Source


      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        In the grand scheme of things, life experience, etc, yeah. 16 (or even 19) is still a child. But there’s actually a huge difference in a teenager vs a single-digit child in terms of how they think and act. But I definitely shouldn’t have lent my car to my 5 year-old nephew, I see that now…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        05 days ago

        Depends on your personal definition of child. 16 is definitely a teenager. For many people, those are distinctly different stages and do not overlap. A middle segment between child and adult. Whereas a different descriptor like minor would apply to both children and teenagers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        05 days ago

        I don’t think minors should have to pay income tax. “No taxation without representation… unless you’re 16.”