• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    019 days ago

    Holy shit can you guys imagine if the jury rules “not guilty, because you got the wrong fucking guy”? Luigi could probably run in 2028 and win.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        The oblique implication in my comment is that if orangeboi (illegally) runs for a third term, then it also does not matter if Luigi (illegally) runs when he’s too young

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            018 days ago

            Only as long as those people keep pretending.

            In reality everyone knows we can just do whatever.

            So executing the rich and forcefully redistributing their wealth is a valid public policy now

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              017 days ago

              I mean, we’ve been trying to do other things, but they won’t play nice. I guess we need to exterminate a few, then offer the rest the opt-in to pay higher taxes as an alternative.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                017 days ago

                The landlords that were holding the Chinese economy hostage were given a chance to relinquish their properties, then they executed the ones who wouldn’t.

                It’s only fair we give them an opportunity to surrender.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          018 days ago

          And if he were to run for a house seat, and we get 2/3 of congress to vote for a package to do this, we could make him president by impeaching and removing POTUS, VP, and have him be speaker of the house and succeed into the presidency for a special term.

          Wishful thinking but it would technically be constitutional. I’ve tossed this idea and many others in my head about how to get massive support across the country to accomplish something crazy bold like this but I could go on and on and there’s lots of what ifs

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            018 days ago

            Per the 1947 succession act if the speaker (or anyone else in the line of succession) fails to qualify, and age is a qualifier, it goes to next in line which would be the Secretary level cabinet positions.

            I’d be very worried about Luigis politics outside of Healthcare. The jump to murder also does question whether he’d be able to make the compromises necessary to pass legislation. He grew up fairly rich iirc and I would like a president with a bit more life experience.

        • ssillyssadass
          link
          fedilink
          017 days ago

          After Kamala there’s no way they’ll have another female candidate. The American people would rather vote for all the adjectives that describe Trump than a woman.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            017 days ago

            Clinton and Harris are just fake smiles on a status quo neoliberal platform. Of course that didn’t go anywhere. Elizabeth Warren might have stood a chance. AOC is outright popular now but I don’t think she would have won, yet.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            After Kamala there’s no way they’ll have another female candidate.

            Which is extra funny given that candidates like Gretchen Witmer, Liz Warren, and AOC are some of their most popular candidates the party still has to offer.

            Gruesome Newsom is going to clinch then nomination on a platform of “America is a fundamentally misogynistic nation” and liberals are going to waltz into 2028 screaming “Vote for us! We hate women more than the Republicans!”

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                017 days ago

                I’ll believe it when I see it. He’s still got the Getty fortune and the Lib half of California media firmly behind him

                • Queen HawlSera
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  017 days ago

                  True, but he’s burned his bridges with the Left via transphobia and trying to court the Right, and with the Right by inviting Right Wingers to the podcast and then calling them Bible Thumpers while trying to court them.

                  He’s got a life raft that’ll prevent him from drowning overnight, but he took a swing at the big time and missed.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    017 days ago

                    he’s burned his bridges with the Left via transphobia

                    He burned it with The Left when he came after the homeless way back during his San Fransisco mayorship. That hasn’t really hurt him, because liberals continue to love the guy.

                    He’s got a life raft that’ll prevent him from drowning overnight

                    He’s the Andrew Cuomo of the West Coast. He’ll never drown. Like a fat turd, he’ll always float to the top.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            017 days ago

            It was quite a blow to my “all humans are inherently good” mindset, I’m now going with “all humans probably have some deeply rooted cultural biases”.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                Maternal instincts, the lived experience of kindness between friends and neighbors, and the last 10,000 years of gradual but undeniable improvements in social equity could argue this point.

                I might also argue that humans are fundamentally good, but still highly mutable. So a few bad apples really can spoil the bunch.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            If that’s the lesson dems took from the election, dems are going to lose again.

            Stop pushing far right republicans as the dem nominees, regardless of their supposed genitals.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            017 days ago

            That’s exactly why they would run another woman candidate. You don’t think the dems are trying to win, do you?

          • Suite404
            link
            fedilink
            018 days ago

            She is 100% an option, but not for the current Democrat party. They will push her our like they did Sanders.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              018 days ago

              Democratic party needs to split up. Bernie has been calling on more senators and congressmen to go independent, but none have jumped off the rotten DNC ship.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                018 days ago

                We need the infrastructure. The parties are too entrenched in law and election structures…

                So the only choice is to tea party them, build a left wing of the party and take over. And I think that’s what AOC and Bernie are running around doing, but it’s going to take time

                In the meantime, we need to resist

                • Laurel Raven
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  017 days ago

                  This. I’ve been saying for a bit now that we need our own tea party movement to push the DNC left

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  0
                  edit-2
                  17 days ago

                  Bernie has been independent for essentially his entire career. Why is it possible for him, but not others?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    017 days ago

                    And how much control does Bernie and the other independents have? Not much… He generally votes with the Democrats and occasionally speaks out

                    We don’t need another 5 independents. We need a couple dozen in a cohesive voting block. We need enough that Democrats will be forced to negotiate with them (because maga won’t)

                    It’s very hard to win as an independent, but it can be done. We need more then that though - we need a party, we need the network of organizers, the infrastructure for donations, and to integrate with 50 slightly different systems for elections

                    And most importantly, you need name recognition

                    All these things would take years of maintained effort to establish, but they exist - better to become a key faction of the democratic party than to compete with them directly

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                017 days ago

                There’s an inherent strategic advantage to claiming the party brand, because so much has been invested in raising its name recognition.

                Very hard to get people to throw away a shot at a winnable primary in pursuit of a much more difficult independent run.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                018 days ago

                And mine from not abroad.

                The Dems are controlled opposition who are funded by the billionaires just like the Rs.

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          017 days ago

          50 States all went to the GOP… crazy how that happens now that Elon Musk counts the vote