@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 17 days agoEngineers vs Architectslemmy.worldimagemessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageEngineers vs Architectslemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 17 days agomessage-square50fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarezoutlinkfedilink0•17 days agoAs an engineer, I prefer to call it minmalism. Quick edit: I saw the typo, but it is also an example of what the sentence is supposed to convey.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•17 days agoLook. i’s ain’t cheap, and half the readers won’t even use it. Leave it out, we’ll claim it was a mistake, and if anyone really complains we can add it back later.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•17 days agoAre you kidding. Just slap an extra 20% of the is you think you used on the end in case.
As an engineer, I prefer to call it minmalism.
Quick edit: I saw the typo, but it is also an example of what the sentence is supposed to convey.
Look. i’s ain’t cheap, and half the readers won’t even use it.
Leave it out, we’ll claim it was a mistake, and if anyone really complains we can add it back later.
Are you kidding. Just slap an extra 20% of the is you think you used on the end in case.
That’s positvely genus!ii
I go with “efficiency”