• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    06 days ago

    Agreed, but sounds more like socialism with authoritarian overtones. I don’t see why we’d need UBI

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      06 days ago

      I agree with the socialism part, but I’m not picking up on the authoritarian overtones. I would want a system like this to be flexible to meet the basic living needs of each person and would view it as more of a stepping stone to a post-scarcity society.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        06 days ago

        The whole social credit thing sounds like something that could easily be taken away depending on your political beliefs

        • Belly_Beanis [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          06 days ago

          These things already exist. Credit scores determine whether or not you can buy a house in certain neighborhoods. People are being deported for their political beliefs. The US has the largest prison population on the planet, both per capita and sheer numbers. When/if you do get out of prison, felonies stay with you the rest of your life, even for something ridiculous like marijuana possession.

          You’re worried about a hypothetical when there’s the real thing right in front of you.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            06 days ago

            I agree largely, but we still live in a society where you don’t need to pass a credit score to get groceries.

            How will removing that not be seen as authoritarian?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          06 days ago

          That’s where things like decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) and smart contracts could come into play. Maybe we could start implementing this without ever involving the government at all.