• @[email protected]OPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    014 days ago

    Well, some are markedly more democratic than others. I still wouldn’t give the US high marks for democracy, but “The ability for the majority of the population to freely choose a candidate of their choice” is miles ahead of “There is one candidate and the Central Committee approved them”, even with all the other fuckery that goes on.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
      link
      fedilink
      English
      014 days ago

      I’ll be honest with you, “there are two candidates and the two party central comittees approved them” sounds only marginally better.

      • @[email protected]OPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        014 days ago

        Independents are allowed to run without the approval of the party, as are third parties in the US system. Furthermore, the two party ‘central committees’ choose the candidates through primary votes. That’s a pretty vast fucking difference.

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
          link
          fedilink
          English
          014 days ago

          You are right in that I wouldn’t consider the US system as bad at giving individuals a voice as the Chinese/Russian systems. It is actually worse than the Hungarian system even afte Orbán fucked it up even more though.

          How many of those primaries happened before the previous election? If I run as an independent, will I get the same campaign resources as the other parties? Otherwise the whole election and the mandate is only about as meaningful as that of Orbán. I don’t consider Hungary a democracy, it’s an electoral autocracy.

          • @[email protected]OPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            You are right in that I wouldn’t consider the US system as bad at giving individuals a voice as the Chinese/Russian systems.

            I mean, that’s my main point of contention. Beyond that I’m not trying to say much.