Cross-posted from “A Federal Judge Is on the Brink of Criminally Prosecuting Trump Officials for Contempt” by @[email protected] in [email protected]


In a thundering opinion on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg announced that he had found probable cause to hold the Trump administration in criminal contempt for defiance of his orders. It is “obvious,” Boasberg wrote, that government officials “deliberately flouted” his commands by deporting Venezuelan migrants to a Salvadoran prison on March 15 under President Donald Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. And now they must answer for their unlawful conduct. “The Constitution,” he declared, “does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders—especially by officials of a coordinate branch who have sworn an oath to uphold it.”

  • Admiral PatrickOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 days ago

    Sounds like that’s where it’s heading:

    If the government refuses this offer, Boasberg held, it must swiftly identify the officials who violated his orders so they may be criminally prosecuted, facing fines and potential jail time. Critically, Boasberg notes that if the Department of Justice doesn’t appoint a prosecutor to take the case, he will do so on his own.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      011 days ago

      swiftly identify the officials who violated his orders

      I think this is likely to be the hangup. Everything with this administration is so chaotic and ad-hoc that it might be hard to pin it on a single person or group. If they don’t have beyond-reasonable-doubt certainty that the person they’re holding in contempt is responsible, it’ll probably just get overturned, weakening the bigger Trump v Courts battle.

          • Maeve
            link
            fedilink
            011 days ago

            Money was exchanged for humans human resources, in illegal activity.

      • Admiral PatrickOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 days ago

        You’re probably not wrong, but hopefully there’s at least a paper trail the judge can work his way up.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          010 days ago

          If any paper trail exists, the government will deny it exists, while concurrently setting fire to it and any other evidence they might have left.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          011 days ago

          Pretty much this is what I’m worried about. Hopefully the government record keeping laws are robust enough that they can eke out a real answer about responsibility by threatening additional charges over failure to document those.

          • oozynozh
            link
            fedilink
            011 days ago

            assuming they weren’t sent via self-destructing Signal messages, which itself is a violation of records law

      • JaggedRobotPubes
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 days ago

        Then you roll over like a bitch while everybody else does what they can to help, but keep quiet next time.