Chris RemingtonM to [email protected] • edit-22 days agoThe inarguable case for banning social media for teenswww.ft.comexternal-linkmessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up177arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up177arrow-down1external-linkThe inarguable case for banning social media for teenswww.ft.comChris RemingtonM to [email protected] • edit-22 days agomessage-square71fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareChris RemingtonOPMlinkfedilink5•2 days agoThere! That’s much better! I agree and well done.
minus-squareMudManlinkfedilink21•2 days agoReally? You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? Could have just said what you thought, saved everybody the trouble. That feels a bit patronizing.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•6 hours ago@remington is all about healthy discussion. He doesn’t mind when people disagree, just as long as they say why.
minus-squareMudManlinkfedilink1•4 hours agoPatronizingly cryptic AND with disciples coming in behind him to explain his whole deal. He should watch out for roaming cups of hemlock, just in case.
minus-squareChris RemingtonOPMlinkfedilink6•1 day ago You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? No. That feels a bit patronizing. That was not my intent. I apologize if anyone felt this way.
There! That’s much better! I agree and well done.
Really? You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? Could have just said what you thought, saved everybody the trouble. That feels a bit patronizing.
@remington is all about healthy discussion. He doesn’t mind when people disagree, just as long as they say why.
Patronizingly cryptic AND with disciples coming in behind him to explain his whole deal.
He should watch out for roaming cups of hemlock, just in case.
No.
That was not my intent. I apologize if anyone felt this way.