@[email protected] to No Stupid [email protected] • 2 years agoCan a company can itself Twitter now?message-square28fedilinkarrow-up174arrow-down114file-text
arrow-up160arrow-down1message-squareCan a company can itself Twitter now?@[email protected] to No Stupid [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square28fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareall-knight-partylinkfedilink5•2 years agoHow many cans could a can call can if a can call could call cans?
minus-squareNarrrzlinkfedilink3•2 years agohow much chuck could a chuck-wood wood, if a chuck-wood would wood chuck?
minus-squareall-knight-partylinkfedilink4•2 years agoI may have to rethink my understanding of the English language
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoWait until you learn what “kuusi palaa” means in Finnish.
minus-squaresquibletlinkfedilink1•2 years agoI think it would work as “if a can could call cans cans”
minus-squareall-knight-partylinkfedilink1•edit-22 years agoI just went with the one that was more satisfying to say and matched the original tongue twister Edit: I am idiot
who called a can?
How many cans could a can call can if a can call could call cans?
how much chuck could a chuck-wood wood, if a chuck-wood would wood chuck?
I may have to rethink my understanding of the English language
Wait until you learn what “kuusi palaa” means in Finnish.
I think it would work as “if a can could call cans cans”
I just went with the one that was more satisfying to say and matched the original tongue twister
Edit: I am idiot