@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square153fedilinkarrow-up1863arrow-down110cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1853arrow-down1external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square153fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•1 year agoIt’s usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•1 year agoThe passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features.
It’s usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine.
The passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features.