It is so difficult to find modern electronics without telemetry and ads. Smartphones, laptops, TVs, home routers, security cameras, cars, game consoles, e-readers, projectors, 3D printers, fitness trackers, speakers, and even some printers. Why can’t customers be free from this data collection and advertising? It’s not that we don’t care about it. There simply aren’t many alternatives, and the few that do exist are either more expensive or offer fewer features. Seriously, we need a list of products we can buy and use directly without worrying about telemetry or advertising.

The following list is updated at https://lemmy.ml/post/52706206. Please note that this list may contain errors.

Other suggestions:

  • gif8287@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Last I checked (which, admittedly, was a few years ago) I literally couldn’t find any security cameras that weren’t compromised in some way. The only options are basically:

    Consumer models tied to “cloud” services
    Generic Chinese ONVIF cameras that probably phone home to who knows where unless you firewall them off from the Internet
    ONVIF cameras that might have a slightly better reputation than the previous category but are only sold through security system installers, not normal retail channels
    Analog (not IP) cameras that you hook up via coaxial cable
    Building your own goddamn camera from scratch with a Raspberry Pi or something
    

    It’s ridiculous!

    For TVs, there used to be the option of Sceptre dumb TVs, but even those have disappeared from the market in the last year or so.

    I’ve been looking for a smartwatch/fitness tracker (and a bike computer, which is kind of a similar category) and the pickings seem very slim there, too. There’s the Pebble and the PineTime, which are open but maybe lack some of the sensors one might want in a fitness tracker, and there’s stuff that’s intended to be proprietary but supported by Gadgetbridge (e.g. iGPSPORT bike computers) . There might be others, but I don’t know about them.

    It’s fuckin’ bleak, y’all. I’m at the point where I’m seriously considering building almost all my own tech out of Raspberry Pis and/or ESP32s because that’s easier than searching for needles in the infinite haystack of surveillance capitalist slop!

    @[email protected] Thanks the post is updated

    https://lemmy.ml/post/52928541 is locked so I replied here

  • gif8287@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    As for laptops, there are a lot of other options like Tuxedo, NovaCustom, and Slimbook

    I would avoid the Brax phone, they haven’t fulfilled orders and are super shady + social media influencer platform is never a great look. I would prefer the Fairphone, they’ve been around for ages, and you can install mobile Linux on their devices too since they let you unlock the boot loader. postmarketOS on the FP6 is developing rapidly and very exciting! Other pmOS supported devices like the OP6 or Pixel 3a series could be considered too, as well as the custom Android ROMs (Graphene, Calyx, etc.)

    AsteroidOS is Linux on smartwatches, what more do you want? You also have Pebble if you’re into e-ink and that sort

    As for TVs, it’s tricky, but just look for the non-smart ones (there are quite a few!), and I know Sony makes the Bravia TVs where you can set them to be “basic” non-smart mode. You could also go with a projector instead, those usually don’t have smart TV shenanigans. You can also use a Linux mini PC running Plasma Bigscreen and/or Kodi as an alternative to Google TV.

    Mini PCs running some form of Linux (Bazzite, CachyOS, Fedora, Mint, whatever) are always awesome. You also have emulation stuff, like the MiSTER Pi mentioned by another user, but you could run emulation stuff on any cheap hardware (running Linux) just fine.

    OpenWRT is supported by lots of routers, and GL.iNet makes routers that have it preinstalled. You also have the MikroTik routers, which run the Linux-based RouterOS (+ they are based in Latvia 🇱🇻)

    Reolink cameras w/ Frigate and Home Assistant is the best combo.

    The only wireless headphones I would recommend are the Fairphone Fairbuds Gen 2, since they won’t die in a few years w/ replaceable parts and battery, and even then, for 99% of usecases, I would rather go with IEMs + some wireless dongle (I use the Fiio BTR11, but others exist too, in particular, the Fiio Snowsky Retro Nano has replaceable batteries of an esoteric form factor). You get the convenience of wireless as well as all the benefits of wired: harder to lose, better audio quality, WAY cheaper (seriously, I spent less than $30 on my kit), longer lasting, etc. I would recommend the Kiwi Ears Cadenza and Truthear Gate, and I’ve heard the Hexa/Pure is great too. Moondrop’s Chu 2 are awesome too with a metal shell for a ridiculously low price, but the brass nozzle oxidises and clogs in humid environments (I am in the humid land of HK, so no go for me)

    As for printers, the Open Printer is crowd funding and looks really neat! You of course have the Brother laser printers too, but not sure about their telemetry and tracking.

    I am moving to Piefed at [email protected] (https://retrofed.com/u/scallisto)
    

    @[email protected] Thanks for the suggestions. I have updated the post. https://lemmy.ml/post/52928541 is locked so I replied here

  • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You can probably add pebble under smartwatch. The new devices have fully open source firmware (and app). There are no ads and the store is to my understanding run by volunteers (rebble, a perfect born after pebbles first attempt at a watch failed many years ago).

    The watches are also fully supported by gadgetbridge.

    • gif8287@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Which elegoo 3d printer are you using?

      Elegoo says they may automatically collect:

      IP address
      
      Device model and OS version
      
      Device serial number and other unique identifiers
      
      Device activation information
      
      Sensor information
      
      Usage data, including feature usage frequency, duration, clicks, searches, settings and update habits
      
      Software/connection performance
      
      Print success rate
      
      Alarm information
      
      Crash logs
      
      Location information, including potentially latitude and longitude
      
      Hardware information from the slicing software, such as CPU/GPU and memory
      
      Software crash and diagnostic information 
      
      • Bev's Dad@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Just an ender clone that I shove an SD card into after slicing. I guess the newer ones do all that so I’ll avoid them.

        Maybe a slicing software without tracking would be nice actually.

  • late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Robert Braxman is a fraud and so is his Brax Phone.

    https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/20165-response-to-dishonest-attacks-on-the-grapheneos-project-by-robert-braxman

    Anyway stop buying or caring about brand new “products”, creating e-waste, and feeding this stupid exponential growth economy and extractive capitalism. You don’t need everything to be the latest version. Engage in the local circular economy, buy used on local marketplaces, reuse and repair old devices. Give second life to old things we already produced.

    You don’t even need to try hard to be private with old, used stuff. Bought an old laptop? Good, it only runs Linux. Bought an old MP3 player? Good, it doesn’t even have Spotify or internet. Bought an old gaming console? Good, you can find any torrent you could ever want, any genre, completely for free, offline.

  • kazerniel@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    If you use a robot vacuum, it might help to get one without a camera, only Lidar.

    (I also made a point of buying a smart tv without a microphone, but it was already hard to find one in 2023, I imagine it’s even worse now.)

    E-ink devices: I think you can put all of them in flight mode, at least that’s what I do, and upload books via USB cable. No need for network features.

    Speakers: Just buy a cheap and basic wired one?

    Smartwatch: How would one work without telemetry? It’s kinda the whole point 🤔 I guess you can try to replace the software with Gadgetbridge.

      • kazerniel@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        nice! wow, at 27 USD it really is cheap :o

        sadly for now I find my Garmin’s features useful, but I hope more open products like this will appear over time

    • gif8287@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Thank you for providing these suggestions. However, for this post, we’re specifically looking for devices that come with no telemetry or ads by default. The goal is to identify products that respect users’ privacy out of the box, so customers don’t have to disable features, replace software, or put in extra effort to make the device private.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s not that we don’t care about it

    That’s not true. People who give the slightest shit about it are in the minority. My supposedly tech savvy relative told me I am “overthinking” smart TVs by never wanting one connected to the internet. The next day after that conversation, the most recent LG scandal came to light. I sent them a link to the video. I saw that they were supposedly typing for a few seconds and then they never responded. I suspect they considered arguing with me about it being a problem and then realized it was going to be a tough argument to have. I doubt that made them think twice about getting more Internet connected devices though. They’ve personally overseen installing Alexas in multiple homes and they think I’m absurd for seeing those as bad for privacy.

    • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      When I got a new TV (late 2010’s 2017 or 19 pretty sure it was 19) the friend hekping me move it in and set it up got me to hook it up to the wifi, I said I did not need it because I have an AppleTV but she insisted. 2020 came around and I got back into pihole, what the hell was I supposed to do in that year? And I saw how much data it was blocking, so I went looking for “smartTV” lists and saw how much more it was blocking. I read stuff and decided to turn off all the “smart” features and just to take it off the network all together.

      I wish it happened sooner but a few years later I fell down the rabbit hole of FOSS and ended up getting a bunch of raspberry pi’s, I dug out an old Mac mini and installed Debian on it to act as a media server because one of my pi 5’s was not doing enough for me. That pi is soon going to replace my AppleTV and just stream the transcoded stuff from my mini and arr stack to my TV that I made dumb.

    • wizblizz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is why regulations exist. Expecting the average corpo to not do evil shit, or the average consumer to understand why this is important is never going to happen.

    • Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Once I get more politically active it will be an absolute nightmare to scrub my house.

      Tasks to do.
      -check my RCA tv, disable all RF connectivity.
      -audit Nvidia Shield and decide if the frequency of telemetry is palatable, likely replace with a Pi5 streamer box. Not sure if that has eARC so maybe adjust my whole stereo setup.
      -move Phillips hue bulbs off the first party hub to a ZigBee hub.
      -remove Google home devices, set up echo dots or whatever they are named and finish setting up the home assistant stack for voice assistant, find cheap tablet for HA dashboard.
      -audit Honeywell home, set temp via home assistant integration only.
      -same with Emporia power devices, local integration only.
      -degoogle phone.
      -replace ubiquity WiFi AP with something else probably
      -replace Synology NAS maybe.
      -shut down Milestone VMS and windows server in favor of an open source VMS, audit POE CCTV cameras for telemetry.
      -audit BAS-IP video doorbell. That should work SIP only, I could probably snag access to their internal code base through work connections, the founder is a really nice lady and the rest of her team is cool too.
      -Remove Windows from gaming PC, Linux steam or wine compatible games only.

      I’m sure there’s more. I probably shouldn’t list all the stuff I use like this but whatever, if I’m tipped over right now there’s not going to be any compromat/ opsec implications.

    • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Just because your “tech savvy relativ” says you should not overthink does not mean the relativ does not care about it.

      It just means your relativ does not assume that its privacy gets invaded by every device.

      This are 2 different things.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        With all due respect I know how they think and I’m not sure why you think you do? This is a “I’ve got nothing to hide” person

        • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I am mostly referring to the first 2 sentences since the other text does not comment on anything that he actually said or did.

          Just because someone is naive enough to think that a smart device does not spy on you or downplays what they know does not mean they do not care about privacy.

          In order to say that the relative does not care about privacy, the relative would have to know the exact extent on what they collect and what they can do with it. You cannot assume that a normal person or even “tech savvy person” understands what is possible.

          It is possible that what you said is applicable for your relative but in general this does not apply.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            It’s interesting that instead of assuming I have any basis for saying what I did, you’re trying to educate me on how to interpret someone’s actions I have known my entire life. I can assure you I’ve tried to have this discussion with them several times. They dismiss every privacy concern brought up if it relates to tech companies. They care about privacy insofar as they think it’s wrong when the government violates it, but if they get a free service out of a deal, they dismiss the idea that the trade off could potentially not be worth it.

            Tldr; your drive by guess at what may have been said does not override information you do not have.

            • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              I never said that you are wrong. You have misinterpreted that. I simply say that in general, that what you said about your relative is not enough to assume that the relative does not care about privacy.

              I never have said anything else. More information was not given.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 days ago

                We are talking about a specific person that you quoted how I described them as if I might be making shit up. The fact that I said “my relative” is enough information for any reasonable person to know I probably have a long history with them. I never once said this applies to every person. I only mentioned they are tech saavy because they absolutely have the capability of understanding and being shocked by privacy invasions, they just decided long ago it wasn’t worth caring about. And I know this due to the dozens of interactions with them on the topic. Including essentially telling me I’m wasting my time caring of my TV spies on me. More history there is that I’ve told them about real cases of this happening years ago also and they dismissed that as not mattering then as well

                Weird interaction.

                • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  We are talking about a specific person that you quoted how I described them as if I might be making shit up.

                  No, thats just you beeing offended. Never once did that.

                  I never once said this applies to every person.

                  But with the quote at the start you implied that there a lots of ppl. It should be common sense that there is almost never a 100% complete agreement within such a broad undefined group.

      • PennyRoyal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ah ffs, why is there privacy space filled with people like this? I knew that Graphene has being targeted with a lot of nonsense like the Wired article, but I didn’t know all that. Hopefully there Motorola partnership gives rise to some more interesting Graphene phones

    • late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Brax phone and their company is really scammy-looking, I wouldn’t recommend it.

      Graphene OS is the only private mobile OS worth the hassle, all other “private” phones usually introduce more untrustworthy 3rd parties than they get rid off, and overall are a downgrade in privacy compared to an average phone.

      If can’t use GOS for any reason, then the only alternative is to use the normal phone you already have as little as possible, and just treat everything on it as not private, and use airplane mode more often.

      • PennyRoyal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s a shame, as there aren’t any other real options at that price point. My major negative with most privacy-focused phones is their size, they’re all massive. I’m really looking forward to seeing what Motorola do with the flip phone note that they’re partnered with Graphene, though I feel like a hardware kill switch and an sd card slot might be too much to hope for

  • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Raspberry Pi? Fairphone 6? I love my ancient iPod Classic. Also, OpenWRT One router? Wired headphones? Get monitor instead of TV?

    We really do need a list.

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Sadly most chips contain backdoors especially Intel and AMD. Unless a performant open source RiscV chip comes along everything has spyware