• Krafting@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Okay I actually love this ad!

    I just wish they would take their own words into account and ship with DDG or qwant as default instead of the default Google search engine…

  • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    A gentle reminder that Firefox executable is no longer open source. It’s source available.

    Firefox executable is now governed by a Terms of Use (instead of the Mozilla License) that allows your telemetry to be used for any reason.

    Switch to Ironfox or Waterfox if you want all the benefits of Firefox without giving your data to Mozilla.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      A gentle reminder that Firefox executable is no longer open source. It’s source available.

      What does that mean? What do you mean by the executable is not Open Source? Firefox project is hosted online and can be used to build Firefox. Or do you suggest that Firefox builds include binary blobs?

      • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Mozilla follows the same model is Microsoft Code with Firefox that the source code is FOSS but it’s bineries are not.

        Firefox, the executable application, is not open source and is considered “source available” because the Terms of Service contains exclusions that are against the tenants of freedoms that must exist in open source software.

        Firefox, the source code, is still licensed via Mozilla Public License and is open source. If you compile it yourself, you must call it something other than Firefox.

        • nxn@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          Firefox, its logo, etc are trademarked and therefore restrictions apply when re-distributing, and that has been the case for as long as I remember. There’s nothing stopping you from compiling it yourself, calling it Firefox, or using their branding, as long as you don’t redistribute your build and modifications to others while still using their branding.

          • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            Ah, I see he was talking about the branding and trademark. Yeah, that has nothing to do with Open Source.

        • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          I don’t think that is how Open Source works. Terms of Service in the build doesn’t change Firefox being Open Source. If the Source code is open Source, then so is the Firefox build, if nothing else is added that is not Open Source. Also according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Public_License the license is compatible with GPL v2 and Debian FSG, is approved by FSF and OSI.

          • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            If the Source code is open Source, then so is the Firefox build

            If that’s the case, Mozilla wouldn’t have spent so much publicity and gotton so much shit a year+ ago for removing the MPL from their executable and developing their TOS.

            And even if it did, their TOS contains provisions that they can use your telemetry for any reason and they initially said they wouldn’t use it to train AI and then they admitted that they use it to train AI. So even you give them the broadest interpretation of OSS, there are still reasons not to use Firefox executable and use an alternative instead.

            • Vincent@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              I don’t recall anything about the MPL being removed from the executable. It’s also absolutely possible (and has frequently happened) to get a lot of publicity about something minor or irrelevant.

            • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              That is not the broadest interpretation of OSS, if it is GPLv2 compatible and the FSF and OSI approve it to be Open Source conform. Collecting telemetry has nothing to do with a project being Open Source or not.

              Your arguments are baseless, unless you can point to what you exactly mean. Can you point to something specific in the license that I can check? Does the Firefox contain anything proprietary? How is the MPL removed, if that is the license of the project? You need to be specific.

    • Alex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      It’s obviously still open source or the various downstream forks of it wouldn’t be able to exist.

      • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        It’s why I differentiated the Firefox executable vs Firefox the application code.

        Firefox the application code is still open source. The executable binary is not.

        • sus@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          That’s true, but it just seems like a silly distinction cooked up by some overly paranoid lawyer working for firefox, that has no practical effect.

      • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        I personally would have switched to LibreWolf, but they don’t have a builtin password manager. And its a bit too restrictive too. I guess Waterfox would be a better alternative, but don’t know how fast they update when Firefox updates.

        • kill_dash_nine@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          Just curious - why is the built in password manager a deal breaker? I’ve always used a 3rd party solution because I am looking for the ultimate in password manager portability because I use different browsers for work and personal.

          • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            Its the most easy way for me and I don’t want to deal with a third party tool for every day use. I use a third party password manager, but it is annoying in daily usage for me. I use it to store all passwords, so it has its use.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      I’m on Firefox since very early days, when I was on Windows XP. I even remember Firefox had a different name in the beginning, need to lookup honestly… I think it was Phoenix maybe?

      • folekaule@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Yep, the standalone Firefox browser’s codename was Phoenix. I was also on it back in the day. From the Firefox Wikipedia page:

        Firefox is the spiritual successor of Netscape Navigator, as the Mozilla community was created by Netscape in 1998, before Netscape’s acquisition by AOL.[14] Firefox was created in 2002 under the codename “Phoenix” by members of the Mozilla community who desired a standalone browser rather than the Mozilla Application Suite bundle.

  • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    This absolutely is the ad we need out there.

    For us here on fedi, yes we all use librewolf or something. And the idea that the internet is going to shit is a daily conversation.

    But for Joe Shmoe and his grandma, oftentimes how do you even begin to explain all that? This they can relate to and maybe snap them out of the endless big tech scroll.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Kind of have to agree with this. I’m still using Firefox, but I’ve very seriously considered changing. Because it’s just managing to piss me off more and more all the time.

      Just as an example, I have two websites that I visit on a fairly frequent basis that Firefox absolutely loves to go to the previous page when I click the next page button over and over and over again. And it’s like, okay, you are getting really, really annoying now.

      It’s bad enough that I’m just like, has Blink won the web. But there is WebKit, and of course there’s Ladybird and Servo. But Ladybird and Servo aren’t ready yet.

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I still use it, is that bad now?

    I haven’t used a lot of different browsers, but when I have tried to use others I have despised them (Chrome, Edge, a few others I can’t recall).