Agreed. I came out of watching this thinking “what is this brain-rot?” I felt like I just watched trash. I don’t feel like the tone does the case any service. The connections they draw seem unsubstantiated and anecdotal at best. The case comes off as if it’s built on speculation and it seems like they state claims as factual without meeting any convincing burden of proof. Supporting the case with more anecdotal accounts doesn’t really save it.