PS: The point here is NOT that poor people shouldn’t have kids, it’s that no one should be having kids without having the basics of childcare covered, which necessitates widespread systemic, societal, and economic change so that no parent needs to worry about those basics, and kids can grow up in secure, healthy environments. I completely forgot to mention this when I originally posted it, and that’s my bad.

  • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    PS: The point here is NOT that poor people shouldn’t have kids,

    You may not think that’s the point, but that is the ultimate effect of your words.

    • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’d see it more like “Poor people shouldn’t exist”.

      But as in “We need a society where nobody is considered poor and everybody is provided for”

      • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        No, this interpretation is too convenient for them.

        Stop creating lives you’re knowingly unprepared to provide for.

        This is a personal indictment, not a systemic one. It specifically treats births as the problem, not wages.

        I do not have children, nor do I plan to—I have way too many video games to play. However, I am not so stupidly suicidal as to suggest that it is morally superior of me to be a zoo panda—or to pretend that it is global warming stopping me from participating in the same desperate struggle for life that my great ancestors did when driving their feet through mud and soil to chase antelope.