• 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Seems like the reviews are embedded with the map download?

    It would have been nice if it were an optional download,like how you can choose which maps should be available offline.

    • Valerie Ashborne@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Seems like the reviews are embedded with the map download?

      Yes, each ‘region’ map has only it’s own reviews.

      It would have been nice if it were an optional download

      Why?

        • Valerie Ashborne@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          That is text reviews with 1000 symbols limit. Even if you take all reviews on platform you most likely would not get even 1 megabyte, and it is not mentioning compression that they (most likely) use for map files ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ .

          So I highly doubt that cutting off reviews will do much in terms of saving space.

          • Calfpupa [she/her]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            All current reviews. There are thousands of locations within each square mile and some cover whole states. It can add up eventually.

            • Valerie Ashborne@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              It still going to be small, again, it is just a text reviews, no pictures or anything (no comments even) with max of 1000 symbols per review.

              Assuming they use utf8 for strings, so the biggest review will take 1 kilobyte at most. Considering most reviews are even less then 2 whole sentences, I doubt it will take much in near… Decade if not more (at which time we would most likely die in world war or something).

              If we take around ~6.5k reviews (based on number in an article), it would mean we would have ~6.5 megabytes for entire world at most + some metadata (but we would not, considering most of reviews are really brief, so I would say we would sit around half of that size) + compressed + divided for entire world, so at most we would have shaved maybe up to hundred of kilobytes (in maybe several years if we would even have enough of reviews) per country/region/state, which does not sound a lot, considering it would require quite a lot of effort to reorganise stuff. So eh, I do not know.

  • vogi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Really hope we will be able to review places directly in the app one day. Im not a big fan of MapCompletes UX. This is a really cool feature though and I already made some reviews.

  • cyrl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Cheers folks - very clearly communicated, appreciate all the work the CoMaps teams are putting in

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I should start leaving reviews of random fucking places around my area.

    Maybe I’ll start by reviewing the nearby river…

  • Remy Rose@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I kinda miss being a Google Guide back in the day, this sounds like a fun awesome successor to that 💓