• ZoDoneRightNow@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    It took them so long I no longer care tbh. I got used to inkscape and scribus. Scribus would be the two of those I would stop using first if I do switch back

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      They will. But so will everyone else.

      We’re going to win by losing many small battles.

  • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Too little too late. I advocated for a Linux version for years, and now with Krita, Graphite, etc. the need is no more.

    • Kagu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I use affinity on windows to make photo books as a hobby. Scribus - the only Linux native FOSS alternative I’ve found - is stuck with the typical FOSS issues of a terrible UI, lack of modern snapping or photo importing features, and an overall lack of polish.

      Do you know of any affinity alternatives for the layout tools?

      • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        No sorry I don’t. Publishing is still one of those areas where open source tools are super lacking. Graphite aims to become a capable publishing tool though, and it’s developing quite fast, so let’s see what comes of it in a year or two. Right now it’s a very capable procedural vector graphics editor. See the “nodevember” livestreams : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iLiaSGSnPs

        Sorry I can’t help more.

  • Kay Ohtie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m excited because I’ve found vector tools for Linux to be really lackluster so far, and end up reaching for Affinity via Wine, and that clunk, for vector work.

    Inkscape I know is a darling thing but like, actually using it? It’s an SVG editor at core, and that’s fundamentally different from “vector editing”, because “vector” is a concept, and “SVG” is a rigidly-defined format. In other words, if it’d be a valid vector operation but not supported by SVG, you (often) can’t do it in Inkscape. It also bounds objects with a manipulator that doesn’t follow the object shape/position, but instead the SVG bounding box for that object. So if you have a long box shape and rotate it diagonally, your bounding box is defined by the most distant X/Y coordinates that would fully surround it in a horizontal/vertical box, instead of being the object itself like all other vector editors do. And that shows something I can’t simply fix with a feature request because it’s part of the fundamental design of Inkscape – that’s way bigger than a feature request.

    • lenocolomo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      After further consideration, I take my statement back and I apologise for judging without knowing. I still keep up my statement with Linux as slop though.

  • thejml@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    As someone who does photography as a hobby/side hustle I’ll say, though it’s not FOSS, it was a SOLID Adobe Creative Suite replacement. You could actually just buy once and own forever instead of all the other subscription based creative software out there.

    Then Canva bought them, said “It’s free!*” and its gone downhill ever since. Luckily I can still use what I bought, because not subscription, but definitely not what it used to be.

          • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            You do need to be connected to the internet however, otherwise it stops working after a few minutes

            • Carrot@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              This isn’t true. In the FAQ on their download page, they explicitly mention that you only need to be online during initial download and installation, then you are free to be offline, either perpetually or for up to 30 days. Its hard to know which because the wording isn’t consistent across official sources. There are features that won’t work without an internet connection, but they are things that actually require an internet connection like stock photos and their AI. Why do you talk authoritatively about something you don’t know anything about?

              https://www.affinity.studio/download

              • moth@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 days ago

                if their wording isn’t consistent, wouldn’t that mean nobody can speak with authority?

                • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Surely the tons of people who use the software have more authority on the matter than someone who doesn’t. Besides, you shouldn’t need a trusted authority to tell you that online features require an internet connection.

                  The wording is clear, Affinity is free, the license is perpetual, but you need to have an internet connection to get updates

                • Carrot@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Yeah, other than directly contacting Affinity, we won’t know which case is correct. However, the one thing we can say for certain is that the credential refresh timer is not on the scale of minutes. From anecdotes in the official forums, it’s pretty clear that it is at least a 30 day refresh timer, though some people report it never needing to be refreshed

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    This is genuinely good news for me. I’ve been using Darktable for the last couple of years. This could add a valuable work and production flow.

  • gerryflap@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Hmmmm interesting. If they bring it to Linux I might have a look, people seem to be happy with their tools.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    That’s actually really awesome news. I’ve been using Linux since 2008, and I’ve never seen companies so pressured to have Linux support. Companies that have never given a shit are now seeing missing dollar signs. That’s big.

    • SomGye@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s a suite of programs that’s fairly similar to Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom (and another one I’m forgetting)

          • reev@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Unless I’ve missed something, it’s actually Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign, not Lightroom.

            • Exec@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              Now I’m sad. I would pay money for a good photo editor on Linux. No, Darktable is a sorry excuse, Rawtherapee is something I’m putting up with because it’s free.

            • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              Yeah, this is correct.

              • InDesign - page layout
              • Illustrator - vector design
              • Photoshop - raster image editing (but has smart layers that can contain vector shapes)

              Source: I was a graphic artist for ages and my first version of Photoshop was 5.0.