- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
The leak involves telling Android to create a keep-alive UDP connection that is offloaded to the hardware Wi-Fi or cellular chip.
GOS fix in progress. Google has reportedly declined the bug report/bounty.
Why are we still letting mullvad be relevant? Until they oust their nazi founder they shouldn’t get a penny or any shared articles.
Google has reportedly declined the bug report
Yet another proof that preventing stores like F-droid is a good security choice /s
What one has to do with another?
Google says F-droid is a security issue. Google refuses to fix their own security holes.
Fdroid can be a security hole. They might not awarded security bounty for some reason. Those 2 things are not connected
In other words, Google prefers security researchers to immediately share vulnerability findings publicly immediately. That way users can properly mitigate their risks appropriately while Google decides whether fixing the vulnerability will affect their bottom line.
Google sure seems to not care about VPN leak bugs that easily enable user apps to track real-world IP addresses without any kind of special permissions, even while the user thinks they’re safe in ‘lock traffic to VPN only mode’.
I wonder why…
Via Graphene issue tracker.
Author: ArminShupuk
@thestinger As I see that you, Daniel, have picked this one up, I want to add that I was just in touch with Yusuf, who found the registerQuicConnectionClosePayload VPN leak. He informed me today that they didn’t pay him and closed the report as “won’t fix.” He had no success with his appeal. Mine seems to be “won’t fix” too, with no success reasoning with them either.
So there are currently already two arbitrary ways for any user app with internet permission to leak the IP address in VPN lockdown mode that won’t be fixed upstream.
Side note, the main GrapheneOS dev being his usual abrasive self (this is his only contribution to the thread).
Author: thestinger
That’s not the spelling of my name.
I don’t see that comment in the linked issue. I do see them triaging and assigning it, though.
Lol wtf he deleted it. Maybe he lurks here.
The original comment called him “Danielle” and then edited to fix it to “Daniel”. Given that it’s the feminine version of the name, I think asking for a correction is reasonable, and deleting that request when it is fixed is also reasonable.
That being said, he could have been more polite about it. Everyone in that thread comes across to me at grumpy, though.




