• Sordid_Seraphim@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    You would argue it, be right on a technicality the same way a bigot can refer to a binary trans person as them to communicate their refusal to accept their identity.

    You can talk all you want about why you do something but if I consistently hear my preferred pronouns being used by you I’m left to make an assumption about your character.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Right, but afaik neopronouns don’t have a specific gender they refer to, so using neopronouns instead of they/them isn’t any different regarding accommodating your gender identity, it’s only different in terms of accommodating your preferences for the language used to describe that gender. It is a signal of potential gender identity denial, but it’s such a low-power signal that any other signal should easily overpower it. It should be clear from someone’s other behaviors what they believe.

      • Sordid_Seraphim@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        It should be clear from someone’s other behaviors what they believe.

        You don’t get to decide how someone interprets your message. I do not use neopronouns but I’m going to tell you right now it’s the height of hypocrisy dictate which pronouns should be ignored.

        I swear to god people will write paragraphs about why its okay for them to not use someone’s preferred pronouns instead of just changing a word in their lexicon for that person.

        God forbid we accommodate the people we interact with.